| |
Analysts, industrialists and academicians
are of the opinion that
a strategic mix of shared services
and outsourcing is the new model that is
driving HR teams in global organisations to
achieve and sustain excellence. However,
what is yet to be understood is whether
outsourcing is really the pathway towards
attaining competitive advantage. Today,
transformation of HR operations has shifted
the focus from a traditionally reactive and
administrative function to one that is tightly
connected to the business. The effect of this
strategy is significant in making it possible
for businesses to respond to market and
human capital changes more rapidly.
When AT&T enters into a seven-year
outsourcing contract with Aon Consulting
for combining the talents of its human resources
and payroll organisations
with Aon’s
core competencies in
employee benefits,
compensation, employment
and other
services – what is their
prime motive? Most
certainly, the obvious answer would reflect
the basic principle kkore on its core competencies.” Initially, outsourcing was done mainly to
bring down costs, however, a changing feature
of outsourcing today is that it no longer
involves only low-key operations. Increasingly,
services that are being outsourced
are those that require highly skilled and
qualified personnel who are able to provide
the service quality standards required and
this has led to a increase in the outsourcing
of human resource services.
Today, human resource professionals
are expected to deliver more advanced and
differentiated human capital skill sets, create
and maintain high performing workgroups,
offer technology platforms with
increased functionality and direct access
to information as well as partner with business
leaders to align people strategies with
business goals in order to achieve corporate
initiatives. Dave Ulrich, a leading scholar
in human resources, recently wrote that
the competitive forces that managers face
today and will continue to confront us in the future demand organisational excellence.
The efforts to achieve such excellence
– through a focus on learning, quality,
teamwork and re-engineering
– are driven
by the way organisations
get things done
and how they treat
their people. Those
are fundamental human
resource issues.
To state it plainly: achieving organisational
excellence must be the work of HR. The
question for senior managers, then, is not
‘should we do away with HR?’ but ‘what should we do with HR?’ The answer perhaps
is to create an entirely new role and
agenda for the field that focuses not on
traditional human resource activities such
as staffing and compensation, but on outcomes.
HR should not be defined by what
it does but by what it delivers – results that
enrich the organisation’s value to customers,
investors and employees.
In order to achieve its strategic business
objectives such as initiate top-line revenue
growth and shareholder value, management
of human capital has become critical. The
current rate of economic, competitive, and
political change demands cost flexibility in all functions of business. The mandate for
the HR function is to work better, faster and
cheaper. However, this changing role of HR
is perhaps not well understood by all.
A research done by Mellon Human Resource
shows that it is only through a focused
approach to ‘HR s hared services’ that
companies can accomplish the imperatives
demanded of the human resource leader.
Today’s organisation’s can no longer maintain
the status quo in HR service delivery.
HR no more identifies with its traditional
reactive and administrative nature and
there has been a clear shift in its focus to
HR being very tightly connected to the business.
The effect of this transformation is
significant in making it possible for business
to respond to market and human resource
changes more rapidly.
Our new model for organisations today
is an offshoot of the obvious understanding
that the traditional model of HR
does not align with the evolving demand
to achieve organisational excellence. A
common theme has emerged towards decreasing
the size of the HR function while
moving transactional activities “out” and,
therefore, deploying fewer human assets
to perform these activities by outsourcing,
leveraging technology and creating common
approaches, processes and practices.
This role of HR shared service, therefore,
affords more time to organisations that can
be utilised for strategic issues.
Changing Role of HR
This changing role of human resource is the
answer to attaining a competitive advantage
in the present market scenario, and
this is reflected in the fact that more and
more companies today are resorting to outsourcing
of its HR services in order to keep
pace with the competition and afford effective
management of its human resource as
a prime asset of the organisation.
HLL (Hindustan Lever Limited) is perhaps one of the greatest examples of
HR evolution. Being one of India’s oldest
organisations with its traditional culture,
Hindustan Lever has gone on to launch
Hindustan Lever Network (HLN), a unique
network marketing opportunity that aims to
be the most preferred business opportunity
by partnering its consultants and providing
them with a business and self-development
opportunity that is truly rewarding.
As a result of this diversion, Hindustan
Lever Network has identified the need to
be excellent in every aspect. Since it’s core
competency lies in business and products,
HLN has started resorting to outsourcing
of all other functions to devote more time
to its strategic issues, reduce fixed cost and
also initiate diversion of non-creative and
non-business activities to outside agencies.
It is this desire for excellence that it has led
Hindustan Lever Network to acknowledge
the growing importance of sharing human
resource services. In this context, Hindustan
Lever Network has approached Planman
Consulting Group to outsource its entire
training activities.
The Planman-HLN association which
has been formed to outsource HLN’s entire
training activities to Planman Consulting
is one of HLN’s initiatives to make time to
concentrate on its core functions. To illustrate
further the contention behind this
association, HLN does not have expertise
or related research in training and development
while Planman-IIPM not only has the
necessary expertise and reosurces, but at
the same time induces cost reduction for
HLN as compared to the investments HLN
would otherwise bear if they were to do
this in-house.
Quite simply, adoption of this “new”
model improves the ratio of human assets Over the years, a variety of models have been designed, considered and even implemented in an effort to achieve this transformation towards HR outsourcing. Perhaps most recognisable to HR executives is the seemingly constant swing between centralised and decentralised models. In the past, organisations believed they could benefit from economies of scales with fully centralised HR services. On the other hand, however, the gain in flexibility to meet unique business-unit requirements related to decentralised service delivery carries higher cost and duplication of effort.
Many organisations that have experienced this swing between centralised and decentralised operations are familiar with the results. One particular note is the belief of employees that the company lacks a common culture or brand. Instead, the heavily decentralised organisations find that business units create duplicate and contradictory HR practices, policies, processes and procedures. These differences across the company are not business requisites, rather the result of history, individual preferences and experiences. Shifting the focus of HR enables the organisation to direct attention on customers’ needs that include creating a company brand identity through leveraging economies of scale.
To realise the benefits of both models, companies are shifting to the shared service approach that enables streamlining of processes across multiple units or locations while maintaining customer focus.
This approach to HR-shared services becomes the critical lever empowering human resource leaders to support their businesses in a way as to advance the enterprise’s strategic objectives. The HR-shared services model has been employed by many leading companies to increase quality, improve service, and reduce processing cycle times as well as expense. For example, various human resource shared services models are found at IBM, Royal Bank of Scotland, Lockheed Martin, Warner Lambert, Hewlett-Packard, Sears and Boeing.
Efficient alright...but what about HR effectiveness?
HR is about people, and it is a common perception that HR efficiency is directly related to how much you know about your people and of course, there is no better answer to that than in-house HR services. But the changing model lays emphasis not just on the efficiency rather the effectiveness of human resource. In the shared service scenario, non-strategic HR activities and specialised HR expertise are removed from the business unit.
The range of activities from transactional to HR expertise to business partners is vast. In our experiences to date, the majority of field-based HR staff have focused on the transactional activities, leaving little or no time available for partnering with the business or bringing depth of expertise around strategic human capital issues like employee development. Shifting transactional activities to technology and shared service organisations enables the organisation to take advantage of economies of scale and, therefore, affords the field-based human resource staff more time to truly focus on those activities at the business partner end of the spectrum.
Today, HR managers in the business units are increasingly called upon as strategic business partners. But what do we mean by a strategic partner? The future HR business unit manager’s role encompasses six key areas of partnership (leadership development, strategic business partner, employee relations, talent management, HR functional specialists and change management consultant).
To accomplish these new roles, most HR departments require fundamental change and growth of competencies. The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) Foundation completed an effort comprising many years of data collection with major global companies that included General Electric, Westinghouse, , AT&T, PepsiCo, Mobil, Oracle, ICI America, LL Bean, etc. The research culminated in a detailed HR competency framework reported in 2000. The framework, which is divided into three domains – core, role specific and level-specific competencies – provides a powerful foundation towards achieving the necessary capabilities to achieve HR and organisational excellence.
The roadmap to human resource transformation is made up of many critical activities that serve to help organisations understand the current state, envision the future, build the model, validate the vision, and implement the new HR service delivery approach.
The advent of technological advances has made it possible for a shared services function to have immediate and accurate knowledge of local policies, procedures, employee history and special arrangements,
thus enabling a centralised function to provide customised service rather than “one-size-fits-all” service.
Also, employees and managers are able to readily access and manage information without HR intervention. The use of direct access (sometimes referred to as self-serv-ice) is a key factor in the redistribution of activities performed by HR. Transactional activities are performed under a tiered service delivery model in which technology provides the first level of support to HR’s customers. A customer-focused service centre provides the next level of support and relatively few issues escalate to human resource specialists.
Our experience demonstrates that leading HR organisations are restructuring operations and leveraging benchmark data to set aggressive and achievable targets to reduce cost – but more importantly create long-term value. Successful transformations rely upon a combination of benchmark targets and better practices rather than any single measure.
Consulting firms such as Mellon Human Resource and Financial Services, An-swerThink’s Hackett Group and others have core capabilities in assisting organisations to identify the current HR operating cost baseline by analysing budgeted and hidden costs to deliver HR services. Executives must recognise the value of benchmark data in enabling solid decision-making that is tightly connected to the baseline data and benchmark comparisons. Targets for service improvement, cost reduction and efficiency in advancing HR’s role must be closely tied to the baseline data.
In fact, most of our clients today are heavily focused on targeting cost reduction while actually improving the quality of human resource service. Growing competition has changed the focus towards a more cus-tomer-oriented approach of doing business where excellence in customer satisfaction is the key to retaining one’s market share. Under such a scenario, it is evident that a lot of time needs to be invested in instilling a more customer focused approach.
The growing importance of people service in business today has made it imperative for organisations to resort to HR-shared service which promises a specialist’s deliverance of every human resource function. Business today has realised the essence of the people factor in organisations as being closely related to its strategic business objectives. The new model which Mellon Research proposes in this paper will perhaps prove to be a guideline for companies today to withstand the implications of facing the changing role of HR in business. 
Although most organisations have recognised the need to make this change and, therefore, accept the new practice of HR-shared services, there is still a question regarding which human resource activity to outsource. The new model proposed herein clearly defines the correlation of each function and its effectiveness as a result of outsourcing. Excellence in implementation of this new concept is the key to ensure effectiveness of this change. It is not just about cutting cost but a pathway to leverage excellence in efficiency by way of HR-shared services.
The article is co-authored by Casey F. Thomas, Arthur Mazor of Mellon Human Resources and Investor Solutions, Boston & Rajlakshmi Saikia, Indian Institute of Planning & Management, New Delhi, India.
Reference
Thomas F. Casey and Arthur Mazor; Transforming The Human Resource Function Through Shared Services; Human Resources and Investor Solutions, Boston News release, May 29, 2002, AT&T Signs Outsourcing Agreement with Aon Corp.
THE NEW MODEL DESIGN
By: Mellon Human Resource and Investor Solutions
The main objective of this phase is to determine and confirm the main responsibilities of each new or existing HR entity that will assist in the realisation of HR’s business imperatives. Each organisation is different and must consider unique business requirements when designing HR’s future state. It is imperative that HR professionals and epresentative customers of HR are involved in the design effort. Design must be a joint effort across the organisation rather than a corporate-driven activity and consider the current state of HR to ensure that the future design can be effectively implemented. Understanding the gaps between the current and future states is extremely important. For example, companies that require major technology upgrades to achieve a particular future state design may find that such a future state is unachievable within the organisation’s timeframe, budget or resource constraints. We have, however, cautioned our clients against focusing in too much depth on documenting the current state. The goal is actually to gain as much information as required to understand operating roles, technology functionality and infrastructure and major processes and procedures. In this way, the design teams will be equipped to understand the overall operations of HR today to guide their design of a realistic future state that meets business needs. Guiding principles should be established providing direction for the design of the new model that will focus on four key areas – people, process, organisation and technology. The guiding principles will help teams understand parameters for design that will include the future role of human resource, expectations for use of technology and savings/investment targets. Our most successful clients establish a simple model to manage the transformation of HR and guide decision-making. All team members must understand how to resolve issues as they rise through the design and implementation stages a major project such as transforming HR. |
| People: Design/Redesign Roles and Responsibilities |
The roles and responsibilities of human resource professionals must shift to enable the new model. In order to meet the strategic needs of the organisation and deliver value-added service to customers, HR roles must be reshaped and redefined. The skills and capabilities required to perform the new roles of the HR professional must be established and transition steps to move individuals to these new roles determined. To ensure HR meets the new goals set, the model must identify measures of success. Performance metrics are selected and monitored on a routine basis. But more important than collecting data for the purpose of ensuring operating metrics are in line with expectations, a “Partnership Agreement” between HR and the business should be crafted to document the HR organisation’s commitments to supporting business goals. |
| |
| Organisation: Develop Service Delivery Matrix |
A service delivery matrix is developed to delineate where activities
will be performed for HR processes function by function.
The delivery matrix provides a clear responsibility for “who does
what” in the new environment. This shapes the detailed design of
the organisation and directly drives the process design/redesign.
Outsourcing options that range from partial to end-to-end arrangements must be
considered in determining how best to deliver the new model. Organisations are
discovering that HR administrative activities are not part of their core competencies,
making outsourcing an attractive option. The option becomes additionally
attractive when investment dollars are not available. utsourcing often enables
streamlining of processes with little or no up-front investment, providing financial
flexibility relative to implementation costs which can be significant when
creating internal shared services call centres and technology. This opportunity is
particularly attractive when investment dollars are low or immediate payback is
required. Of course, processes must be redesigned in the same fashion regardless
of the degree of outsourcing to achieve the maximum benefit. |
| |
| Organisation: Develop Service Delivery Matrix |
Streamlining and standardising processes is the goal of the process
design/redesign. By prioritising based on high-impact, process
flows are documented according to the guiding principles.
Processes should fit the new model and leverage the automation
provided by the new technology. This activity serves not only to
direct the flow of information and activity in HR, but also to illustrate the change
from the current environment. During redesign, a gap analysis is performed to
capture the support requirements needed to implement the new processes. Leveraging
the top internal better practices to identify the future “norm” and advancing
those processes by incorporating an understanding of benchmarks and external
better practice design to create the most effective processes. Through a team-based
approach involving participants from across the company, future processes can be
designed rapidly and to a deep level of detail to prepare for implementation.
|
|
| Technology: Select Enabling Technology |
| The selected human resource delivery model and process designs
must drive technology decisions here possible. Further, better
practice organisations have moved towards a “best of breed”
approach where the technology selections are driven by capability
in a functional area rather than more traditional sole-source
provider solutions. |
| |
|
|